All technology-based methods of doing inventory with Alma involve comparing a list of what is actually on the shelves with what Alma thinks is on the shelves.
Each inventory method has a mechanism for comparing those lists, and presenting the results. Library staff can then work to reconcile the differences, by marking items as LOST, reshelving items to correct shelving mistakes, and resolve items currently marked as LOST but actually on the shelves.
All three methods below can accomplish this task.
The most "bullet-proof" method, and the least likely to break or become obsolete over time, is the as-designed Alma method, listed last below.
But it's also the most complex, detailed method. And has the disadvantage of not reporting out-of-order items.
I recommend starting with the first method, the "Purdue" method. as it is the simplest and easiest to use, and generates the most succinct report to work.
If the "Purdue" method gives you adequate and accurate results, then no need to go further. But if you still have inventory concerns after using the Purdue tool, you can move on to one of the other methods.
This tool was developed by Purdue University as a PHP-based API program, whose use is documented here:
A customized implementation for WACTCLC institutions can be found at:
As presented at 2018 (Spokane, WA) ELUNA Conference, Chemeketa College developed this method of inventory, which involves an analytics report and custom Excel spreadsheets.
This method of inventory represents the out-of-the-box workflow for performing inventory.
This method of inventory was well-presented at ELUNA 2018 in Spokane, WA by Tennessee Tech University.